Saturday, March 14, 2009

Call to Halt the GP Infiltration of Cosmetic Surgery-Dr Gordon Moyes MLC

Choice survey highlights Dr Moyes’ concerns about cosmetic surgery

Last year Dr Gordon Moyes AC MLC asked a Question Without Notice in the Legislative Council directed to the Attorney General, representing the Minister for Fair Trading, regarding the safety of women and girls being placed tragically at risk by the lack in NSW of stricter government regulation of the field of cosmetic surgery. He pointed out that this was an industry rife with serious dangers and abuses of many kinds that he had heard about from many of his constituents.

Now Choice magazine has released the results of their recent undercover survey showing that women were often not informed of all of the risks of the breast augmentation, liposuction, Botox or other cosmetic procedures they were seeking consultations for. Others were pressured into having the procedures, or insinuations that they would be more likely to find a partner if they did. These were among the appalling examples of unprofessional conduct encountered during the undercover survey, which was conducted after the Medical Practice Amendment (Advertising) Regulation 2008 was passed by the NSW government.

One of the problems is that any medical doctor or specialist can legally perform cosmetic procedures because this is unregulated, but only plastic surgeons have undertaken the seven additional years of training. Choice recommended that everyone should always carefully evaluate the qualifications and experience of the practitioners they are considering when they are seeking any cosmetic surgery. Plastic surgeons are the best-qualified specialists to be trusted with such treatments; they have the initial FRACS (Fellow of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons) after their names.

The non-regulation of this lucrative and competitive area has been compounded by the use of false advertising. Cosmetic practitioners have been promoting themselves as ‘surgeons’, and banned from using supposed ‘before’ and ‘after’ photographs but are still getting away with it.

There needs to be stronger regulation to protect consumers, according to Choice. Dr Moyes has called upon the government to have such practitioners removed from the industry by having their licences cancelled, and suggests that those with only GP status should not be allowed to undertake cosmetic surgical procedures.

Source: http://www.gordonmoyes.com/2009/03/13/choice-survey-highlights-dr-moyes-concerns-about-cosmetic-surgery/

Thursday, February 26, 2009

CHOICE Survey shows the ugly face of cosmetic surgery

Survey shows the ugly face of cosmetic surgery

Need to check closely after unprofessional practices revealed.

CHOICE says people seeking cosmetic surgery should always check on the qualifications and experience of practitioners after an undercover survey of 30 clinics in Sydney and Brisbane revealed appalling examples of unprofessional conduct.

The consumer group says it is concerning that the three women in the survey, who requested consultations for breast augmentation, liposuction and Botox, were often not informed of all the risks of surgery.

Any medical doctor or specialist can perform cosmetic procedures but plastic surgeons have to undertake at least seven years of additional training. It’s estimated that in Australia there are 1000 cosmetic surgeons in regular practice.

Some of the women felt rushed through their consultations with the cosmetic practitioners, who then lost interest if the work seemed unlikely. In the breast augmentation case CHOICE’s mystery shopper was shown the breasts of a sales consultant as an example of the doctor’s handiwork; was told she “needed’ the work done and was even offered a discount if she consented for before and after photos to be published on the internet.

In another visit the woman was told she had a better chance of finding a partner if her breasts were enlarged and on three occasions, without asking, was given brochures offering loans to fund the procedures, which are not covered by Medicare or many private health insurers.

“Given the known risks and the apparent unwillingness of some cosmetic surgeons to discuss them there needs to be stronger regulation to protect consumers,” said CHOICE spokesman Christopher Zinn.

“Until then our best advice is to make sure of the qualifications and experience of any cosmetic surgeon you are considering and to educate yourself as to the risks of any procedures, so you can ask as many questions as you like.”

CHOICE says the non regulation of this competitive area is compounded by profuse advertising. In some states cosmetic practitioners have been stopped from promoting themselves as “surgeons” and banned from using before and after photographs.


Source: http://www.choice.com.au/Media-and-News/Media-releases/2009%20Media%20Release/Survey%20shows%20the%20ugly%20face%20of%20cosmetic%20surgery.aspx

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Cosmetic surgery not all prettty - CHOICE investigates

Cosmetic surgery investigation

Surgery marking illustration

In brief

  • The difference between a plastic surgeon and a cosmetic surgeon can be up to eight years of specialist training.
  • The cosmetic surgery industry is largely unregulated, so how do you work out who is most suitable for your needs?
  • There were some important questions that some cosmetic surgeons did not ask our shadow shoppers, which are critical to ensure the patient’s safety.
Among the latest promotions for cosmetic surgery procedures are “Need a lift?” and “Beautiful breasts always get noticed!”. From print ads and radio spots to glossy magazines dedicated to promoting the latest surgical techniques, cosmetic surgery has never been more in our faces – and the industry is growing at a rapid rate.

Although no formal statistics have been collected on the number of procedures taking place in Australia, experts estimate more than 1000 practitioners perform cosmetic procedures regularly. Popular as it is, however, cosmetic surgery is far less regulated than other areas of medicine – and as CHOICE discovered, some surgeons seem to be getting away all too easily with some alarmingly unprofessional conduct.

CHOICE's investigation

To find out how some cosmetic surgery clinics operate, CHOICE recruited three women as shadow shoppers. They visited cosmetic surgery clinics in Sydney and Brisbane, requesting consultations for breast augmentation, liposuction and Botox, and reported back on their experiences. We then formally invited members of the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) to give expert opinions on how these consultations were conducted.

Who's who of the cosmetic surgery industry

  • Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) This is a not-for-profit membership organisation representing plastic surgeons in Australia. Plastic surgery incorporates both reconstructive and cosmetic surgery. Members must be Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (FRACS), have completed specialist surgeon training in plastic surgery and must adhere to a strict code of ethics.
  • Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery (ACCS) Previously, to enter the field of cosmetic surgery a medical practitioner would have to do so on an apprenticeship basis (not subject to any quality controls), resulting in varying quality of results. The ACCS was set up in 1999 to fill the gap in differences in quality of cosmetic surgeons, and has an accrediting medical faculty although it is not recognised specialist training.
  • Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (FRACS) This training is recognised by the Australian Medical Council, which is authorised by the federal government to certify medical training.

CHOICE verdict

Considering how easily a doctor can open and operate a cosmetic surgery without specialist training, if you choose to go to a cosmetic surgeon, you need to be clear that you may not be seeing a specialist in the field. At the very least, make sure he or she is a member of the Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery.

As there is no industry regulation, unfortunately it is still up to consumers to assess the cosmetic surgeon and clinic after asking questions and doing their own research. A potential patient should always check the qualifications and experience of the cosmetic surgeon, as well as the number of surgical procedures he or she has performed, before deciding to go under the knife.

Given the risks if a cosmetic procedure goes wrong, CHOICE would like to see more regulation of this industry to protect consumers.

02.A non-regulated industry

Regulation of the industry

While most practitioners regularly describe themselves as either plastic surgeons or cosmetic surgeons, in some cases the difference can be up to eight years of additional training for plastic surgeons. Despite the popularity of cosmetic procedures and increasing competitiveness of the industry, in Australia there is no regulatory body. Instead, there is a range of medical colleges and associations all claiming to offer training and qualifications for doctors providing a range of cosmetic procedures.

Currently, any medical doctor or specialist can perform cosmetic procedures, as it is not recognised as a medical specialty by the Australian Medical Council. However plastic surgery is recognised as a specialty, and members of the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons are highly trained, members also of the Royal College of Surgeons, and perform both reconstructive and cosmetic procedures. The non-regulation of this growing area of cosmetic medicine is compounded by profuse marketing, following the legalisation of advertising for medical practitioners in 1994.

In 1999, the NSW government commissioned an inquiry into the cosmetic surgery arena; 10 years later, most of the subsequent key recommendations have still not been implemented.

Who should I choose?

In this fiercely competitive industry, CHOICE discovered intense rivalry between the two main industry associations, the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) and the Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery (ACCS). Both vehemently put their case to us, but it is up to consumers to decide which is the best option for them. Plastic surgeons undertake a minimum of seven years of additional training once they have obtained their medical degree and most likely become members of the ASPS, which provides specific guidelines to which practitioners must adhere.

Plastic surgeons are also Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, which awards them the status of specialist. The ASPS claims many doctors without specialist training are doing complex cosmetic surgery procedures and advertising themselves as leaders in their field. ASPS President Dr Howard Webster says there is nothing illegal about a GP undertaking surgical work so long as they disclose that information to the patient, but stresses the benefits of specialist training. ”If you train in a certain area then you should probably work in that area. You would probably use an orthopaedic surgeon to do hip surgery on you instead of a GP.”

Cosmetic surgeons The Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery (ACCS) was established in 1999, stating that its purpose is to fill a gap by providing training and representation for a range of doctors with varying qualifications who have an interest in cosmetic surgery. To qualify as a Fellow of the ACCS, members must be “at least five years postgraduate” and have worked for a minimum of three years in a surgical environment. The college then provides two years of specialist training, and members are audited annually. ACCS President Dr Daniel Fleming argues that “cosmetic surgery is already an area of specialised practice and the only area of medicine practised by a range of doctors from diverse specialty groups from GPs, dermatologists to ear nose and throat specialists, all of whom are united by the fact they conduct cosmetic medical practice”.

In late 2008 the ACCS announced it would be mandatory for its members to disclose how many times they had performed a particular procedure at the initial consultation, if fewer than 100 times. It is also awaiting a decision on an application it made in 2007 to the Australian Medical Council to have cosmetic surgery recognised as a medical specialty. In the meantime there have been a few small positive developments for consumers, with the Victorian government banning “before” and “after” photographs in advertising, while in Queensland the term “surgeon” can only be used by Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. While both major industry associations (ASPS and ACCS) have their own guidelines, as does the NSW Medical Board, these are not enforceable.

Update: Draft code for Australasian College of Cosmetic Surgery rejected by ACCC

Since our initial research, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has signalled it will deny authorisation for a code of practice and bylaws developed by the ACCS. In its draft determination the ACCC says it has concerns that a number of clauses in the College's code are not effective.

The ACCC says that it considers that the code in its current form is underdeveloped, and encourages the College to further develop the code with a view to addressing the concerns raised which include transparency for external appeals, a robust and well promoted complaints process and for members to provide sufficient information to patients regarding qualifications, credentials and experience.

The ACCS has 3 weeks to re-submit this application and has indicated that it is willing to work with the ACCC to further develop the code.

03.What our shadow shoppers found

Breast augmentation

Breast augmentationBreast augmentation is one of the most popular cosmetic procedures, as well as one of the most emotive. Our shadow shopper visited 12 clinics and uncovered some appalling examples of unprofessional behaviour, including:
  • Being shown the breasts of one of the sales consultants as an example of the doctor’s work.
  • Being told by one doctor that she “needed” to have the surgery done.
  • Being offered a discount if she agreed to have “before” and “after” photos of her breasts published on the internet.
  • Even being told that if she had her breasts enlarged it would increase her chances of finding a partner!
All this aside, our ASPS experts rated overall explanation of the procedure’s potential risks as particularly bad. Our shadow shopper was not totally informed by the doctors about dangers such as haematoma, infection, leakage or scarring.
Some did not even ask why she was considering the treatment. Only seven checked her weight, while only two clinics provided evidence of accreditation when asked (another had a certificate in the waiting room).

In a few instances our shadow shopper also felt she was being pushed into making a decision, and three times was offered brochures about credit without asking (see Change now, pay later, below).

Liposuction

LiposuctionLiposuction is another popular procedure, but also one of the most dangerous. In February 2008, a young Adelaide woman died after having liposuction, as did a Melbourne woman in 2007. Liposuction usually involves pumping the “problem” area with liquid before sucking fat out of the body. It can be painful and requires a high level of post-operative care.

Our shadow shopper was rated by ASPS experts as a poor candidate for liposuction – they suggested she would need to lose weight first and that an abdominoplasty (tummy tuck) would probably be more suitable. She visited 14 cosmetic surgery clinics, and while our experts felt some of her consultations were reasonable, as some cosmetic surgeons suggested abdominoplasty by a plastic surgeon, most also suggested she consider having liposuction in other areas of her body.

One doctor suggested other cosmetic procedures to improve her appearance, such as removing fat from her chin and another doctor suggested removing some moles and skin tags, even though she didn’t request them.

While the general advice about liposuction was sound, not all the doctors said how many surgeries they had performed – and even when they did it was very vague. Very few doctors mentioned their actual qualifications and accreditations, hence placing the onus on the patient to do all the asking.

Botox

Botox doesn’t involve surgery and nowadays seems an everyday treatment, even on offer at so-called “Botox parties” held in private homes. Despite this image, it is still a risky procedure and not suitable for all candidates.

BotoxIt’s also critical that potential clients are questioned thoroughly before undertaking the treatment, particularly if there is a possibility the patient is pregnant – an Australian baby was born with severe defects possibly as a result of the mother using a virtually identical treatment to Botox in her first week of pregnancy.

Our ASPS experts didn’t consider the shadow shopper a suitable candidate for Botox and suggested other alternatives would work better for the deep line on her forehead. She visited 12 cosmetic clinics and received varying advice.

One doctor said Botox would not be suitable as she would be unable to use her eyebrows to express herself, instead recommending a filler, which our experts felt was reasonable advice. However, nine doctors recommended both a filler and Botox. Six recommended a brow lift (along with Botox or a filler), which the experts considered reasonable.

While most of the advice she received was acceptable, discussion of risks in all the consultations was minimal. The amount and location of the injections varied widely between consultations. Our experts assessed that one doctor would be injecting in the wrong area of the face, while another told the shadow shopper that Botox wouldn’t fix her problem, yet offered the service anyway.

Shadow shop results concerning

Overall, the results of our shadow shop are concerning. Without discussing risks, it’s extremely difficult for a potential patient to make an informed decision. There were also some important questions that some cosmetic surgeons did not ask the shadow shoppers, which are critical to ensure the patient’s safety.

Some of the shadow shoppers also said they felt rushed through their consultations, and that some practitioners lost interest quickly when it became clear they weren’t a suitable candidate for a procedure. One doctor even took phone calls to arrange a golf game during a consultation!

Change now, pay later

Cosmetic surgery can be very expensive, and is not covered by Medicare or many private health insurers if it is being undertaken for aesthetic reasons only.

A number of finance companies and brokers are targeting potential cosmetic surgery patients with expensive loan offers. So if you’re in a hurry to have a procedure done, perhaps you’re thinking a loan is the answer? Perhaps not. Cosmetic surgery loans can be far more expensive than a low-rate credit card. Mediplan charges an interest rate of 16.9% for members and 17.9% for non-members, including a 7% processing fee (up to a maximum of $295). For an operation costing $4000, the fee would be $280.

Both the Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons and Consumer Action Law Centre (CALC) are critical of these schemes. “If you buy a car on finance, if you can’t afford the repayments at least you might be able to give it back to help pay your debt,” says Carolyn Bond from the CALC. “But what do you do with a breast implant?”.

04.Questions to ask + case study

Questions to ask

Before you arrive at a consultation it’s important to be prepared. Take a list of questions to ask the doctor. Below are some examples.
  • What are your qualifications and experience?
  • How many times have you performed the procedure?
  • How many times have you performed it in the past six months?
  • Can I speak to previous patients?
  • Are there any complications associated with the procedure?
  • If complications do occur or the procedure is not successful, how will you deal with this?
  • Where will the surgery be performed?
  • Will a qualified anaesthetist administer the anaesthetic and/or sedative medication?
  • Will I need time off work?
  • Are there other post-operative side-effects?
  • Will there be any visible scarring following the procedure? How can this be minimised?
  • What aftercare will be provided and will this be included in the treatment costs?

‘Everyone’s reaction is different’

ReactionWhen Kay from Queensland started developing slight jowls at the age of 36, she decided to try a cosmetic procedure. She began to research her options but found information provided by the colleges and organisations too overwhelming. She then investigated the website of a cosmetic surgeon who regularly advertises in the newspaper.

Happy with the information she found, Kay made an appointment with the doctor to discuss her options. He suggested a threadlift, which was described as less invasive than a facelift and involved pulling back sagging skin via a series of small threads attached under the skin.

Kay was quoted $5000 for the work and decided to go ahead with it despite her disappointment with the doctor’s manner. “I would have liked a more personal connection. It was very much like he was thinking ‘just show me the money’.” Despite being told the procedure was minimally invasive, Kay was alarmed by how much swelling developed afterwards. When she returned to the doctor she found him dismissive, saying only that “everyone’s reaction is different”.

Three years later, Kay says she is very unhappy with the results. “I have noticeable skin folds behind my ears, which the doctor told me would settle down, and every now and then I have a ‘pinging’ sensation in my temple, possibly as a result of one of the threads retracting. But I don’t want to go back to a doctor who will just tell me it’s a reaction and everyone is different. I thought the whole thing would be seamless and unnoticeable, but that hasn’t been the case.”

Source: http://www.choice.com.au/Reviews-and-Tests/Food-and-Health/Beauty-and-personal-care/Cosmetics/Cosmetic-surgery/Page/cosmetic%20surgery.aspx

Friday, November 21, 2008

Cosmetic Surgeons versus Plastic Surgeons

What's the big difference? They all do boob jobs don't they? They sure do, but there's a little more to consider than just that!

Actually 'cosmetic versus plastic' is one of the most controversial issues in cosmetic surgery, and if you're thinking about having cosmetic surgery of any kind, it's an issue you need to get your head around before you take the big leap.

Another thing you need to get your head around is that this industry is not well regulated, in fact it's barely regulated at all, and this may be hard for some to believe.

Many consumers assume wrongly I'm afraid, that because it's surgery, the regulators must be right across it. That's the way it should be of course, but unfortunately that's not the way that it is.

Did you know that anyone with a basic medical degree is legally, albeit controversially, entitled to perform complex, invasive cosmetic surgery procedures and describe themselves as a cosmetic surgeon?

Its a matter which has most plastic surgeons fuming- they have 7 to 10, and often 12 years of formal Australian Medical Council (AMC) accredited specialist training further to their basic GP qualification.

Click on the following links to learn more about your choices in this industry.

Buyer of Beauty, Beware - The Four Corners Report
"It’s plastic surgeons versus cosmetic surgeons, scalpels drawn. The plastic surgeons deride cosmetic surgeons as lacking qualifications and breadth of"... By Jonathan Holmes

What’s the Difference Between Cosmetic Surgeons and Plastic Surgeons? - "It may come as a surprise to you to know that many doctors calling themselves Cosmetic Surgeons have completed no more than their basic medical qualification or have not done any further surgical training beyond the basic medical degree!" By Deirdre Tozer

Call to Halt the Cowboy Surgeons-The Australian - 16 Feb 2008 ... The lack of regulation of cosmetic surgery is a national disgrace that allows " shonky" and underqualified practitioners to peddle treatments ... By Adam Cresswell

Patients at Risk in Ugly Cosmetic Surgery Wars - "A turf war between plastic surgeons and self-styled "cosmetic surgeons" has left the industry dangerously unregulated, despite a damning report calling for change seven years ago." By Louise Hall

Cosmetic Surgery Regulations Lag in NSW -Nearly10 years after the State Government commissioned a report on cosmetic surgery, most of its main recommendations have not been implemented. By Valerie Lawson

Source: Deidre Nolan http://www.blognow.com.au/thedeidrenolanreports/

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Unecessary Liposuction - Tara Reid left with saggy lumpy stomach and thighs

Tara Reid Confronts Rumors Over Plastic Surgery


When it comes to cosmetic surgery, many stars still don't admit that they've had work done. But Tara Reid wants everyone to know about the "botched" breast implant and liposuction procedures that left her embarrassed to show her body in public.


"I got lipo because even though I was skinny, I wanted -- I'm not going to lie -- a six-pack," she told Us. "I had body contouring, but it all went wrong. My stomach became the most ripply, bulgy thing."
Reid unwittingly exposed the disastrous results when she posed for pictures at a November 2004 party and her dress strap fell down. But she was also embarrassed in private moments.


Could It Happen to You?

Reid's botched surgery came as no surprise to one California plastic surgeon.
"No, not surprising at all," said Dr. Brent Moelleken, a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon and professor of plastic surgery at the University of California at Los Angeles. "Celebrities ... often do less research than 'normal' patients."

So-called normal patients are not immune to plastic surgery mishaps. The best way to avoid those mishaps is to know that your surgeon is qualified, experts said. Talk to your plastic surgeon, said Moelleken. Ask yourself, "Is he reasonable? Is he telling me what I want to hear rather than what is good for me?" If your plastic surgeon insists on a procedure that doesn't feel right, "run the other way," Moelleken said.

"The most important part of getting a good result from plastic surgery is the surgeon you choose," said Dr. Darrick Antell, spokesman for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

More info go to : http://news.makemeheal.com/tara-reid-liposuction-tummy/322

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

A warning regarding CDC Clinics Armadale

Blood, passion and botched jobs to rival Nip/Tuck

Julia Medew
April 15, 2008

Accused: Armadale cosmetic surgeon Cynthia Weinstein.Accused: Armadale cosmetic surgeon Cynthia Weinstein.
Photo: Jason South


IT STARTED like an episode of plastic surgery drama Nip/Tuck: a dispute involving allegations against a cosmetic surgeon from a nurse siding with the doctor's ex-husband and a beauty therapist accused of passionately kissing patients in the surgery.

But there was a serious side to the story. Armadale dermatologist and cosmetic surgeon Cynthia Weinstein fronted the Medical Practitioners Board yesterday accused of performing procedures she was not registered to carry out, often resulting in "poor outcomes" for her patients and glamorous staff.
Counsel assisting the board, Fiona McLeod, SC, told the first day of the two-week hearing that between 2000 and 2005, Dr Weinstein performed "skin stitch" procedures, "fat pad removals" and chemical peels and administered silicone injections to patients either inappropriately or in a fashion for which she was not registered.

The practices amounted to unprofessional conduct after the board entered into an agreement with Dr Weinstein that she not perform skin incisions but stick to certain dermatological practices, Ms McLeod said.

In one case, a patient was left with "significant facial asymmetry" and "extensive puckering" of the skin around her eyes after a "skin stitch" to try to lift her face went wrong.

The patient, one of six complainants to the board, claims Dr Weinstein did not warn her of the risks of such a procedure or that she might need to have skin cut from her face. Despite corrective surgery, the woman still feels her facial features do not look right, the hearing was told.

In a lengthy opening to the panel, Ms McLeod said Dr Weinstein exposed a patient's eyes to a laser machine while removing "fat bags" in 2004. When the patient called to say she was in pain, Dr Weinstein prescribed her drugs over the phone without examining the patient.

In the same year, Dr Weinstein also allegedly repaid a dissatisfied patient $3300 on the condition the woman did not complain about the outcome of her treatment. After the patient telephoned the Health Services Commissioner, Dr Weinstein called the patient, asking her to drop the complaint.
Ms McLeod said that while six patients would give evidence about their dealings with Dr Weinstein next week, many staff would comment this week about her "cavalier and reckless" attitude towards health and safety.

This weakness caused one nurse to suffer a needle-stick injury from a syringe used on an HIV-positive patient, Ms McLeod said.


A nurse with 25 years' experience, who is now working for Dr Weinstein's ex-husband and fellow cosmetic surgeon, Marshall Segan, told the hearing she was shocked to discover that staff working for Dr Weinstein had little understanding of laser safety.

"Quite often they would close their eyes instead of wearing glasses," the nurse said yesterday.
The nurse, who worked for Dr Weinstein when she shared a clinic with Dr Segan in East Melbourne and cannot be named, said her colleagues also told her they had been asked to clean a Roll-CIT (a rolling device containing lots of tiny needles) after it had been used on a patient with hepatitis B.
"It was just asking for trouble," she said. "It was an accident waiting to happen."
The nurse said that after she told her colleagues to refuse to clean the device, "Dr Weinstein said she would clean it herself".

A beauty therapist who worked for Dr Weinstein for three years told the board that she became increasingly concerned about her safety at Dr Weinstein's Armadale clinic, Dr Skin. "When we were walking past (the laser machine) … we would get a flash in our eyes," she said. "I had to go to the doctor to get my eyes checked because my eyes became very sensitive to sunlight."
The same therapist said she was told to clean the Roll-CIT device, which contained tissue, blood and skin, to be re-used. She said the device was re-used so often that needles started getting stuck in people's skin.

The beauty therapist said she resigned in 2006 after she lost respect for Dr Weinstein and felt she had been bullied.

But Phillip Priest, QC, for Dr Weinstein, challenged the therapist on the reasons for her resignation, asking her if she had engaged in physical relationships in the surgery. He said Dr Weinstein had told her that such relationships were inappropriate.

"Was there not passionate kissing in the surgery?" he said.

"That is an absolute lie!" the woman told the panel before conceding she had been "friendly" with two patients.

The hearing continues today.

THE ALLEGATIONS

- Performed inappropriate procedures on six patients in 2000-05, sometimes with "poor outcomes".
- Repaid a dissatisfied patient $3300 on the condition the patient not complain.
- Exposed staff to lasers, resulting in eye injuries for one nurse.
- Asked staff to clean a device containing needles for re-use after it had been used on a patient with hepatitis B.
- Did not dispose of hazardous material correctly, resulting in a nurse suffering a needle-stick injury from a syringe used on an HIV-positive patient.

Article Source: The Sydney Morning Herald
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/blood-passion-and-botched-jobs-to-rival-niptuck/2008/04/15/1208025136423.html


See also:

Pioneer cosmetic surgeon faces new peer probe

December 2, 2007

Under scrutiny: Cynthia Weinstein faces further hearings.

COSMETIC surgeon and dermatologist Cynthia Weinstein — owner and director of swanky High Street Armadale laser clinic Dr Skin Centre — is being investigated by medical authorities again.
Dr Weinstein has been sanctioned twice by the Victorian Medical Practitioners Board — in 2000 for botched surgery and 2005 for Medicare fraud.

The board now has referred Dr Weinstein to a formal hearing due to complaints made against her.
Such hearings, usually launched when prima facie evidence suggests a doctor has engaged in serious unprofessional conduct, can impose restrictions on a doctor's practice or cancel a doctor's registration.
A spokeswoman for the board said she could not provide details of the complaints, and said no date had been set for a hearing.

Dr Skin's website does not identify Dr Weinstein but says its dermatologist is an internationally recognised expert with an "extensive number of medical publications in respected international journals and laser textbooks". Dr Weinstein is a former chairwoman of the Australian College of Cosmetic Surgery's laser committee and was the college's director of medical training.

But on on March 23, 2004, Dr Weinstein was convicted and fined $1000 for Medicare fraud in the County Court. The Director of Public Prosecutions had appealed against a Magistrates Court sentence of a bond without conviction imposed in December 2003.

Company records show the business name Dr Skin was registered on March 19, 2004, and the owner of Dr Skin is CDC Clinics Pty Ltd. Dr Weinstein is its only director and shareholder.

She told The Sunday Age she was not aware of the hearing. "I'm sure I'll hear about it in due course if that's the case," she said. "I guess … you could speak to my solicitors."

Dr Weinstein was one of the first doctors in the country to use lasers for cosmetic procedures, having trained in the United States in the 1980s. Even her critics acknowledge she is technically more proficient with lasers than most practitioners.

"Her desire to get good results overpowers her natural caution as a doctor …" says one critic. "She's a risk taker, she pushes envelopes."

Before being sanctioned by the medical board she ran the high-profile Laser Surgery Institute in East Melbourne and aggressively pursued market share in the flourishing cosmetic surgery market with regular advertising and television appearances.

Dr Weinstein is still invited to speak at conferences on laser use and cosmetic surgery despite the medical practitioners board hearing in 2000 that she had performed a brow lift on a 71-year-old patient without her consent, resulting in permanent nerve damage, lumpy skin, a startled look and extensive scars.

The patient discovered the brow lift when she felt metal screws in her head after Dr Weinstein had treated her for other cosmetic procedures.

In a separate incident involving treatment for abdominal obesity, the board heard that Dr Weinstein had performed liposuction without removing excess skin, resulting in a large flap of skin hanging down as far as the patient's thighs.

Dr Weinstein advised the patient that her skin had a marvellous ability to shrink or retract, which was unrealistic and misleading, the board said.

The board found that she had engaged in unprofessional conduct of a serious nature with these patients and adjourned the hearing of allegations by six other patients after her lawyers proposed to end the formal hearings.

Dr Weinstein agreed to restrict her medical practice to clinical dermatology and not perform surgical procedures other than removal of lesions.

The board suspended her for six months from October 2000 and imposed conditions involving counselling and audits of her clinical practice.

In March, 2004, she was found guilty of defrauding the Commonwealth by receiving $11,323 from more than 200 Medicare claims. She was convicted and fined $1000.

In March 2005, the medical board found her actions constituted unprofessional conduct of a serious nature. She was reprimanded and fined $2000.

"It involved a sustained defrauding of Medicare by nurses undertaking the provision of clinical services that should have been provided by Dr Weinstein," the board found.

In September 2005, Dr Weinstein agreed to further limit her work, meaning she no longer undertakes blepharoplasty, or eyelid surgery, or fat pad removal. She also undertook not to perform any skin stitches or "thread cosmetic procedures".

Source: The Age http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/pioneer-cosmetic-surgeon-faces-new-peer-probe/2007/12/01/1196394689049.html?page=2

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

About this Blog

Stay tuned for the latest clinic and cosmetic industry updates, and of course, our passionate opinions (plus the odd ramble).

xx The Shrinc Girls